That "Fictional" Bible and "Evolved" Morality- Not Quite

​ Sce Sci me- gp Actually most Ancient Historians know the Bible is historized Fiction based on Forgery and emulation Mythology! Evolution can explain Morality!! *** @Sce Sci ytube Yeah, you mean all those historian scholars linked to modern University culture that descends from Christian monastic schools, secularized as a conflict-resolution strategy following the Protestant Reformation and anti-authoritarian Christian Enlightment, that operates according to that historic model and the non-Greek historic Christian scientific principles that "God says what is possible, not Aristotle"? BTW, I think you mean to say "Historians of the Ancient World," or more typically, "Biblical Scholars." The problem with "knowledge" is that you have to know that you´re actually doing some form of Philosophy, and engaging in interpretation based on assumptions, and stand in relation to alternative schools of thought and classification systems themselves. Anybody thinking that the Bible is mere "Fiction" and your other assertions is anachronistic and an extremist reductionist who should move to China and work in a village or factory to have a little anthropology and epistemology smack them in their artificially flavored video game and Hollywood faces. A little threat of state-sanctioned organ harvesting should open your Sci-Tech razzle dazzled eyes to a few basic aspects of the strengths of the Judeo-Christian West and its own kinds of limitations. Those "Fictional words" of FD Roosevelt about the importance of religion and his clarity of thought and action led him to exceptional preparedness over the Isolationists´ objections, theist or not, because of FDR´s integrity in relation to a Judeo-Christian Higher Power rather than hypocritical political posturing. FDR is one of many examples, including the end of slavery as a pioneering act of Social Movements ignited by the Quaker- Friends. The Q-F´s have a post-monastic highly spiritual practice of a kind that is being studied even scientifically already. Thus, not only is the Philosophy of Religion one of Religion´s established forms of Philosophy, it is already being supplemented by Science. As for Evolution and Morality, hands up, you´re surrounded. Since you try to claim Evolution as an Absolute and Supreme Truth, we have to ask what Truth is. As a form of modern Philosophy, Evolutionary thought has emerged from the human phenomenon of cultural development and its own psychosocial, sub-evolutionary complexity dynamics that led to modernized, complex Christianity in the first place. Thus, co-existing philosophical Levels of Explanation mean Evolution tries to explain Morality, which is a human religious behavior and area that is being studied, not directed by evolutionary biological philosophers. Morality is its own phenomenon that reductionist extremists confuse in their zeal for evolutionary thought. Sorry. I suggest studying some Anthropology and Sociology to prepare you for the reality checks ahead, including the evolutionary theory of symbolic behavior and shamanism. ***

Sce Sci GrePe-me https://youtu.be/L0-tFahPVIU https://youtu.be/tRrq3s3P3Pw https://youtu.be/pDfYA21lDic https://youtu.be/bQmMFQzrEsc https://youtu.be/-lggQfd-kZQ https://youtu.be/7xVBldyy_Oo https://youtu.be/uLcK3Up8z7c https://youtu.be/-5dyJNMTD6A https://youtu.be/-5dyJNMTD6A What Genesis Got Wrong: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL32CC279BF7082A24 Top Ten (Failed) Proofs for God's Existence: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL24169BF14A977E08 Top 10 (Failed) Proofs the Bible is True: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLw-sbZFAk8EHxfA7oq-N5bD8AXw6FS5qC https://youtu.be/Gpw-TSd36l8 ***

Gr P @Scep Sci Letting links do your talking and thinking? Not good. I looked at BS, ah, Bible Skeptic´s God´s Ex pf 1. First of all, I´m a modernist and empirical theist Christian, and would orient any doctrinal Christian about Christian spiritual and philosophical modernization. As for Bib Ske, I see that it tries to pull the Atheist chameleon maneuver, "Nobody here but us science fans. There is no God." Science (i.e. scientific philosophy) investigates natural phenomenon and doesn´t normally revert to non-mechanistic hypotheses. In certain subdiscipline studies of human behavioral phenomena, that has changed, in brain scans and psychosomatic medical studies, for example. If the doctrinal Christians don´t know they are doing Metaphysical Philosophy and mixing it up with Science, atheist materialists do the reverse. In science, you just say, "We don´t normally work with the God hypothesis. We´re mechanistic in Physics" not, "There is no God." That´s all because Science is actually a form of Philosophy, and if God is the eternal unobservable source of Higg´s fields and particles, he´s got some multidimensional vision, multipolar eyesight equivalent to have spawned spirritual-religious phenomena from Shamanism across the spectrum until the Abrahamic religions and Jesus´ legacy in Western Civilization. That is the interdisciplinary Philosophy of Religion. You can´t escape your psychological and philosophical behavior and the relevance of the question, "What is the meaning of atheists denying the qualitative Christian theistic reference points, balance of components, and visionary experiences that underlie the justifications of the freedom of thought in a unprecedentedly complex Christian and theist-derived and permeated Civilization?