The Gods Are Not a Fact! Except, They Are. Science Is Philosophy, Not Reality

Pope Hilarius II eno ard • ONE QUESTION: Do you agree the existence of the gods are NOT fact? The definition of existence requires objective reality. Surely, you agree they are not? (this doesn't mean the gods do not exist. I am simply asking if you acknowledge, they are not fact) • − Avatar greenpeaceRdale1844coop Pop Hilar II • a minute ago Gods, or gods, are various kinds of facts, and just like science itself, i.e. scientific philosophy, they are human-based social facts, at various Levels of Analysis and Explanation. At the Level of Metaphysical Philosophy, they converge in terms of the philosophical fact apparent through the syllogistic philosophical method, i..e. the Kalam Cosmological argument for starters. 1. Anything that has physical-energetic existence has a cause. 2. The Universe exists. 3. Therefore, the Universe has a cause. Just as scientific/natural philosophy has imagined its phenomena and its labels, like phlogiston or the ether, and then revise those terms, "emergentism" has been advanced no less in scientific philosophy in observing that things as simple as physics phenomena becoming chemistry phenomena involves a shift in Systems Theory, the appearance of unpredictable and new forms of behavior not reducible to its subsidiary system, but supervenient. It also involves complexity theory. As primate-human biology evolved psychological and anthropological symbolic behavior, neurochemical, ethological, and ecosystemic levels of cognition show that they can be subsidiary to and supervened by human minds. However, ancient Greek philosophy had the likes of Thales develop initial scientific philosophy and Socrates moral philosophy. The role of human psychosocial development as embedded in social context follows how Aristotle followed logical inductive-deduction showed how he perceived First Cause logic, but assumed the Universe was eternal and that that invalidated First Cause logic. He maintained his Unmoved Mover, instead of a Prime Mover. That is followed by his science lineage being relegated to a vestigial role in neoplatonism after two main proteges. He had to flee when Alexander the Great was assassinated out of fear of association. The issue of morality and how it is sustained. Socrates, meanwhile, had been the teacher of Aristotle´s main teacher, Plato. Socrates had pursued his own insight into moral questioning method spurred by the input of the Delphi Oracle, intriguingly. That is to say, the psychosocial cause of Socrates´ own ascension was directly transcendental and metaphysical in nature. And "pagan," at that. That brings us to Jesus. I´ll let that sink in. Jesus alone is the direct heritage of the emergence of modern scientific philosophy, built by Christians out of antecedents using the metaphysics codified by the monk Thomas of Aquinas in the 1200s. Aquinas took Aristotle´s rusting First Cause relegated to a "dusty chest," and asserted its relevance by developing it into five arguments for God. That is the foundation of Newton´s own inclination to make his metaphysical observation that enoch a. has cited.